Duolingo Speaking Sample: 40 High-Scoring Response Examples

This collection presents 40 authentic speaking prompts with expertly crafted high-scoring responses. These examples span six essential categories: Education & Learning, Personal Growth & Values, Society & Responsibility, Technology & Modern Life, Culture & Experience, and Environment & Daily Life. Whether you're preparing for your first DET or aiming to improve your previous score, these samples will show you what high-quality spoken responses sound like.

 

What Is the Duolingo Speaking Sample?

The Speaking Sample is a scored section of the Duolingo English Test that evaluates your ability to speak extended responses in English. Your recording is sent directly to institutions along with your scores, giving admissions officers a clear impression of your speaking proficiency.

Time Limit: You will receive a prompt and have 30 seconds to prepare, followed by 3 minutes to record your response.

Expectations: Your speech should be organized, grammatically accurate, and focused on the topic.

Purpose: It's your opportunity to showcase not just your English proficiency, but also your ability to express ideas clearly and persuasively.

Evaluation Criteria for Speaking Sample

Your response will be evaluated across three key dimensions:

Evaluation Criteria	What High-Scoring Responses Demonstrate
Content	Address the prompt directly with relevant ideas; maintain an appropriate style; develop thoughts progressively; engage the listener effectively
Fluency	Speak at a natural pace; pause appropriately; minimize filler words; avoid repetition and excessive hesitation
Pronunciation	Articulate clearly; pronounce syllables accurately; use correct word stress; apply appropriate sentence stress and intonation

How to Deliver a Strong Answer in 3 Minutes

Here's a proven time-management strategy to help you stay focused and effective:

First 15 seconds: State your main point directly

lOpen with a clear answer to the question

lAvoid lengthy introductions or background information

Middle 2 minutes 30 seconds: Develop your response (2-3 supporting points)

lProvide specific examples from your experience

lExplain your reasoning with concrete details

lConnect ideas logically with natural transitions

Final 15 seconds: Conclude briefly

lSummarize your main point or offer a final thought

lEnd confidently without trailing off

40 Speaking Sample Prompts with High-Scoring Answers

Category 1: Education & Learning (1-7)

Speaking Sample 1: Should students choose their subjects freely or follow fixed programs? Why?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

You know, I really believe students should have the freedom to choose their subjects, especially once they get to high school or university. I mean, when you’re studying something that genuinely interests you, it’s just so much easier to stay motivated and actually enjoy the process. I remember this pretty clearly from my own experience in secondary school. When I finally got the chance to pick electives, I went for psychology and creative writing instead of more math classes. Honestly, that decision completely changed my attitude toward learning—I was way more engaged and excited to study.

That said, I do think younger students, like those in primary or middle school, really benefit from a fixed program. You know, the basics—math, science, language skills—those are kind of non-negotiable because they build the foundation for critical thinking. And let’s face it, no matter what career path you end up taking, those skills are super useful.

So, in my opinion, the best system is probably a mix. Like, early on, you stick to the core subjects to make sure everyone has the essentials. But as students grow older and start figuring out what they’re passionate about, they should get more freedom to specialize. That way, you’ve got the balance: a solid foundation plus the chance to dive into areas that really matter to you personally. And I think that’s what makes education both practical and inspiring.

Speaking Sample 2: What basic ability should every child learn? Why teach it early? How would it have benefited you as a kid?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Well, I honestly think every child should learn critical thinking—you know, the ability to analyze information, question assumptions, and make independent judgments. If kids start practicing this early, they build habits of thoughtful reasoning instead of just accepting whatever they’re told as fact. And that’s super important, because once you get used to questioning things, you’re less likely to be misled later on.

Critical thinking, in my view, is kind of like a survival skill in today’s world. There’s so much misinformation floating around—on social media, in the news, even in casual conversations. When young people learn how to evaluate sources, spot logical fallacies, and look at issues from different perspectives, they’re way less vulnerable to manipulation. Plus, they become more confident in making decisions that actually make sense.

Looking back at my own childhood, I really wish I’d developed these skills earlier. Honestly, I used to accept information without a second thought—whether it came from teachers, the media, or even friends. And yeah, that led to some pretty embarrassing moments when I repeated things that turned out to be totally wrong. If I’d learned to ask simple questions like “How do we know this is true?” or “What evidence supports this claim?” much earlier, I would’ve built stronger analytical abilities sooner. And, to be fair, I probably would’ve avoided spreading misinformation myself.

So yeah, teaching kids critical thinking isn’t just useful—it’s essential.

Speaking Sample 3: Can online learning match traditional classroom education? Share your thoughts on both methods.

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

So, honestly, I feel like online learning and traditional classrooms both have their own strengths, and it’s not really a case of one completely replacing the other. Online education, for example, gives you amazing flexibility—you can study at your own pace, pause whenever you need to review something tricky, and even access courses that might not exist locally. I’ve actually taken a few online courses myself that weren’t offered at my school, and they really broadened my knowledge in ways I wouldn’t have expected.

That being said, traditional classrooms definitely bring something that online learning struggles to match. You know, that spontaneous interaction and collaborative energy you get when people are physically together. In-person discussions often spark ideas you didn’t see coming—like when someone asks a question and suddenly the whole class dives into a new perspective. Plus, the immediate feedback from teachers, who can literally see if you’re confused or engaged, is super valuable.

So, in my opinion, the future probably lies in blended approaches. Like, use online platforms for delivering content and letting students practice at their own pace, but keep in-person sessions for discussion, collaboration, and hands-on activities. That way, you get the best of both worlds: the flexibility and accessibility of online learning, combined with the irreplaceable human connections that come from traditional education. And honestly, that balance feels like the most practical and inspiring way forward.

Speaking Sample 4: Describe your most effective study habit. How did you develop it, and why does it work for you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

So, my most effective study habit is definitely active recall—you know, testing myself on the material instead of just rereading notes over and over. I actually came up with this approach after realizing that passive studying wasn’t working for me. I’d read my notes again and again, but when exam time came, I just couldn’t remember the details.

What I started doing was making flashcards and practice questions right after learning something new, then testing myself regularly. At first, honestly, it felt kind of tough because it showed me exactly what I didn’t know, and that was uncomfortable. But I realized that discomfort was actually the point—it highlighted the areas I needed to focus on.

The reason this works is that retrieval practice really strengthens memory pathways in a way that passive review just doesn’t. Every time I manage to recall something correctly, it becomes easier to access later. And when I struggle to remember, that’s basically a signal telling me, “Hey, you need more practice with this concept.”

This technique completely changed how I study. Instead of spending endless hours rereading and feeling anxious, I now study more efficiently and with way more confidence. I retain information much better because I’m actively engaging with it, not just passively exposing myself to the same notes again and again. And honestly, that shift has made studying feel way more productive and less stressful.

Speaking Sample 5: What subject do you find most interesting? What makes it engaging, and how has it influenced your thinking?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Well, I’d say psychology is the subject I find most fascinating, because it kind of explains why people think and behave the way they do. And the cool thing is, every concept I learn feels immediately relevant—I can literally see these principles in my own behavior, in my relationships, and even in everyday social situations.

What really makes psychology engaging, though, is how it challenges assumptions we usually take for granted. Before I studied it, I honestly thought people’s actions always reflected their true character. But once I learned about situational factors and cognitive biases, I realized context plays a much bigger role than I’d imagined. That discovery completely changed the way I interpret other people’s actions.

And, you know, the subject has made me more empathetic and less judgmental. Like, when someone acts in a frustrating way, I don’t immediately assume it’s their personality—I stop and think about what circumstances might be influencing them. Psychology has also made me more self-aware. I catch myself noticing my own biases and irrational thinking patterns, which helps me make better decisions.

So yeah, that ongoing influence on my thinking is exactly why psychology feels so interesting. It’s not just information to memorize—it’s more like a lens that permanently changes how I understand human behavior.

Speaking Sample 6: Tell me about a teacher who changed your perspective. What did they do differently, and what did you learn?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I’d say my literature teacher, Mr. Chen, really changed the way I looked at learning. What stood out was how he treated mistakes—not as something shameful, but as something valuable. Most teachers, you know, focus mainly on correct answers, but he did the opposite. He would spend time exploring why wrong answers seemed reasonable and what kind of thinking led to them.

I remember once misinterpreting a poem. Instead of just correcting me, he asked me to explain my reasoning step by step. And as I talked through it, I realized where I’d gone wrong myself. That moment taught me that mistakes aren’t signs of weakness—they’re actually opportunities to refine your thinking.

And honestly, that lesson went way beyond literature. Mr. Chen showed me that real intellectual growth happens right at the boundary between what you know and what you don’t. Being wrong basically means you’re pushing that boundary. Since his class, I’ve been much more willing to participate even when I’m not totally sure, because now I see confusion as part of genuine learning.

So yeah, shifting from fearing mistakes to embracing them has strengthened every part of my education. And I think that perspective is something I’ll carry with me for a long time.

Speaking Sample 7: Should schools focus more on practical skills or academic knowledge? What's your reasoning based on your experience?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Honestly, I think schools need both practical skills and academic knowledge, but right now the balance feels a bit off. It leans too heavily toward academic content while kind of neglecting life skills that students actually need right after graduation. For example, I left school knowing advanced calculus, which is fine, but I had no idea how to make a budget, understand taxes, or negotiate properly—skills that became necessary almost immediately in adult life.

Of course, academic knowledge matters. Math develops logical reasoning, literature builds empathy and communication skills, and science teaches analytical thinking. These abilities transfer across different situations. But the problem is, many students still leave school unprepared for the practical challenges they’ll face within months of graduating.

From my experience, the ideal curriculum would integrate practical applications into academic subjects. For example, math classes could include personal finance units. Science could cover health literacy and how to evaluate medical information. And English could teach professional communication or even conflict resolution.

This way, you’re not choosing between preparing students to think and preparing them to function—you’re doing both at the same time. And honestly, that’s what a well-designed education should look like: giving students the intellectual tools plus the practical skills they’ll need in real life.

Category 2: Personal Growth & Values (8-14)

Speaking Sample 8: What have you done that makes you feel most proud?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I feel most proud of organizing a tutoring program that paired struggling students with volunteer tutors at my school. The idea began when I noticed classmates were embarrassed to ask questions publicly but clearly needed help. I also knew many peers excelled at explaining concepts and creating a solution that benefited both groups.

The challenge wasn’t the idea but the execution. I had to recruit volunteers, screen them for reliability, match students based on learning styles and schedules, and set up a system to track progress. At times, I wanted to give up—especially when early matches failed and students felt discouraged.

But I kept going, improved the matching criteria, and added regular check-ins. By the end of the semester, we had helped thirty students raise their grades, and many formed genuine friendships. What makes me proudest is that the program became sustainable and continued after I graduated.

This experience taught me that real impact comes from following through when things get difficult, not just having good intentions.

Speaking Sample 9: Tell me about a time when you showed someone in charge that they made a mistake. What did you do about it, and how did handling it this way affect you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

So, there was this group project where our team leader assigned tasks without really asking about our actual strengths. She gave me research work, even though I’m much stronger in data analysis and visualization. And honestly, I could tell other people were mismatched too.

At first, I hesitated. I didn’t want to seem difficult or like I was undermining her authority. But then I realized that if we stuck with those assignments, the project would suffer. So I decided to approach her privately after a meeting. I framed it carefully, saying something like, “I noticed the task assignments, and I’m wondering if we could talk about how to best use everyone’s strengths. I’m strong in data analysis—would it make sense to adjust some tasks?”

She actually responded really positively. She admitted she’d made assumptions, and we reorganized the work. The project went much better after that, and she even thanked me later for raising the issue respectfully.

That experience taught me something important: challenging authority isn’t automatically disrespectful. It’s all about how you do it. If you approach it as collaborative problem-solving instead of confrontation, people are much more receptive. And for me, it was a confidence boost—I learned to trust my judgment while still being considerate of others’ roles.

Speaking Sample 10: What personal goal are you working toward right now? Why does it matter to you, and how are you approaching it?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Right now, I’m working toward becoming conversationally fluent in Spanish. And honestly, this goal matters to me for a few different reasons. On the practical side, it would help me communicate with Spanishspeaking colleagues and clients. On the personal side, it would let me connect more deeply with my friend’s family, since they mostly speak Spanish at home.

But beyond that, I think learning another language really challenges my brain in ways my usual work doesn’t. It forces me to be patient with slow progress and to get comfortable making mistakes in public—qualities I know I need to develop.

My approach is pretty structured. I practice daily using language apps for vocabulary and grammar. I also watch Spanish-language shows with subtitles, which helps me pick up natural expressions. And twice a week, I meet with a language exchange partner. That part is definitely the most uncomfortable, but it’s also the most valuable, because real conversation forces me to think quickly and accept imperfect communication.

I’m treating this as a long-term commitment rather than expecting fast results. I track my progress weekly, which helps me notice small improvements over time. For me, the goal isn’t just about linguistic competence—it’s also about building persistence and learning to stay comfortable with sustained challenges.

Speaking Sample 11: Describe a skill you want to develop. What makes this skill valuable, and what steps will you take to learn it?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I really want to develop public speaking skills, because I’ve noticed that effective communication strengthens almost everything else. You can have great ideas, but if you can’t deliver them clearly and confidently, they often go unnoticed. I’ve seen people with less knowledge still influence decisions, simply because they spoke well.

The truth is, I get nervous when speaking to groups, and that weakens my credibility no matter how strong my content is. It’s already cost me opportunities—I’ve avoided presentations and missed chances to showcase my work.

To improve, I’m taking a multi-step approach. First, I joined a public speaking club where I can practice regularly in a supportive environment. That’s helped reduce my anxiety. Second, I’m studying skilled speakers to see what makes their delivery effective—their pacing, pauses, storytelling, and body language.

Third, I’m actively seeking opportunities to speak instead of avoiding them, even when it feels uncomfortable. Each attempt builds my confidence. I also record myself to spot issues like limited vocal variety or filler words.

Breaking the skill into manageable parts makes it feel less overwhelming. And honestly, every time I practice, I feel a little more capable. I know it’s going to take time, but I’m committed to building this skill because it’s valuable in every area of life.

Speaking Sample 12: How do you handle stress when facing difficult situations? Give me a specific example from your life.

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

When I’m stressed, I’ve learned to first acknowledge the emotion instead of pretending I’m fine or rushing to fix everything. It might sound counterintuitive, but accepting that I’m stressed actually helps me think more clearly.

A good example was when I had three major deadlines in the same week. My first reaction was panic—I felt completely overwhelmed. Instead of diving in frantically, I took about thirty minutes to write down what was stressing me and what I could actually control.

That exercise showed me I was catastrophizing—imagining worst-case scenarios instead of focusing on practical steps. So I broke each project into smaller tasks, estimated realistic time frames, and created a schedule. I also reached out to one professor early to ask for an extension, and she agreed because I approached her before it became a crisis.

What helped most was focusing on one task at a time instead of juggling all three in my head. Whenever anxiety rose, I paused, took a few deep breaths, and then returned to the task in front of me.

That experience taught me that stress feels worst when you think you’re powerless. But once you take small, concrete actions, you regain control. And now, whenever I face stress, I remind myself that breaking things down is the key.

Speaking Sample 13: What does success mean to you personally? How has your definition changed as you've grown?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

For me, success used to mean hitting impressive external markers—like top grades, prestigious positions, and recognition. I measured my worth by comparing myself to peers, which honestly created constant anxiety because someone always seemed ahead.

But over time, my definition has shifted. Now, success means living according to my values, maintaining relationships that matter, and engaging in work that feels meaningful. It might sound less ambitious, but in reality, it’s more demanding, because it requires ongoing honesty about what I truly value rather than what I feel pressured to pursue.

This change came from experiences where external achievements left me feeling unexpectedly empty, while small moments—like helping a friend through a tough time or finally understanding a concept after long effort—brought genuine fulfillment.

I realized that if I adopt other people’s definitions of success, I’ll never feel successful, because those standards keep shifting. Defining success for myself allows me to recognize it when it happens.

So now, I regularly ask myself whether my choices align with my priorities and whether I’m treating others and myself with integrity. That reflection helps me stay grounded. And honestly, this personal definition of success feels much more sustainable and meaningful than the one I used to chase.

Speaking Sample 14: Tell me about a failure that taught you something important. What happened, and how did it shape you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

One of my biggest failures was not finishing a major independent research project, even though I had months to prepare. I kept postponing the difficult analytical sections, convincing myself I still had plenty of time. But as the deadline got closer, I realized I couldn’t produce quality work. Honestly, it was humiliating, especially because I had talked about the project with so much enthusiasm.

That failure taught me a really tough but essential lesson about the gap between intention and commitment. I genuinely wanted to finish, but wanting something doesn’t mean much if you don’t take consistent action.

The experience forced me to look closely at my work habits. I realized I often overcommit because ambitious projects make me feel capable at the start, but I struggle with sustained effort once the work gets demanding. Admitting that pattern was uncomfortable, but it was necessary.

Now, before I commit to something, I ask myself not just whether I want the outcome, but whether I’m truly willing to handle the tedious parts too. I’ve become more selective, but also more reliable.

So yeah, even though the lesson came through embarrassment, it ultimately made me more self-aware and trustworthy. And in a way, that failure shaped me more than some of my successes, because it taught me how to follow through realistically.

Category 3: Society & Responsibility (15-21)

Speaking Sample 15: What must your age group do for future generations? Which problems should you help solve? Why is this crucial?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Well, I think my age group has a huge responsibility toward future generations, and honestly, the most important thing we need to do is tackle global challenges like climate change, inequality, and access to education. If we don’t act now, the problems will only get worse, and younger generations will inherit a world that’s far more difficult to live in.

Take climate change, for example. We’re already seeing extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and environmental damage. If my generation doesn’t push for sustainable practices—like reducing waste, switching to renewable energy, and supporting ecofriendly policies—future generations will pay the price.

Another issue is inequality. Too many people still lack access to basic opportunities, whether it’s quality education, healthcare, or fair wages. My age group needs to advocate for systems that are more inclusive, because wasted human potential is not just unfair—it’s a loss for society as a whole.

And of course, education itself is crucial. We should work to make learning accessible and relevant, preparing young people with both academic knowledge and practical skills. That way, they’re equipped to solve problems we can’t even imagine yet.

So yeah, it’s crucial because the choices we make now don’t just affect us—they shape the future. If we act responsibly, we can leave behind a world that’s healthier, fairer, and more sustainable.

Speaking Sample 16: If you became your country's leader, what would be the first thing you would fix? What makes this issue important? How would fixing it benefit everyone?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

If I were my country’s leader, the very first thing I’d focus on would be reforming education funding. Right now, schools in wealthier areas often get far more resources than those in low-income communities, mainly because funding depends on local property taxes. And honestly, that creates a cycle where disadvantaged students receive a weaker education, which limits their opportunities and reinforces inequality.

For me, this issue is about fairness. Talented students shouldn’t have their futures constrained by circumstances they can’t control. And beyond fairness, it’s also about efficiency. We’re wasting human potential that could drive innovation, productivity, and social progress.

Fixing this would benefit everyone, not just underfunded schools. Stronger education systems create more skilled workers, informed citizens, and creative thinkers, which strengthens the economy overall. It also reduces crime and other social issues linked to limited opportunity.

Another benefit is social trust. When people see that opportunity is genuinely equal, they’re less likely to feel the system is rigged. That helps reduce polarization and rebuilds confidence in institutions.

So yeah, if I had the chance to lead, I’d start with education funding. Investing in quality schooling for all isn’t just about helping individuals—it’s about building a stronger, fairer society for generations to come.

Speaking Sample 17: Should wealthy individuals be required to donate to charity? What's your position, and what reasons support it?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Honestly, I don’t think wealthy individuals should be legally required to donate to charity. But I do believe they should face higher tax obligations to support public services, because that achieves a similar outcome while keeping spending decisions accountable to society as a whole.

The problem with mandating charity is that wealthy donors might direct funds toward causes that benefit them or reflect their personal biases, rather than addressing society’s most urgent needs. For example, we often see affluent people giving huge amounts to elite universities that already have massive endowments, while underfunded public schools continue to struggle.

Another issue is that charity shouldn’t replace systemic public programs. If we rely too much on voluntary generosity, essential services become unstable, and vulnerable groups end up dependent on individual preferences.

That said, wealthy people do have moral obligations to contribute more. They’ve benefited from public infrastructure, legal systems, educated workers, and stable markets—all of which have helped them accumulate wealth. Progressive taxation is a fair way to balance that advantage.

So yeah, the difference between mandatory charity and mandatory taxes might sound small, but it’s huge. Taxation ensures society collectively sets priorities, not just the wealthy. And that’s why I think higher taxes, rather than forced donations, are the right approach.

Speaking Sample 18: What qualities make someone a good leader? Use examples from people you know or have observed.

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I think good leaders combine a clear vision with genuine humility. They know where they want to go, but they’re open to insight about how to get there. I saw this in my debate team captain—he had strong ideas about our strategy, but he always invited feedback and adjusted plans when our suggestions made sense.

Another quality is leading by example. Effective leaders don’t just talk; they show through their actions. My captain would stay late helping new members prepare, proving that everyone’s growth mattered, not just winning competitions. That kind of behavior inspires people far more than speeches.

Consistency is also key. Leaders need to align their stated values with their actual behavior. Nothing damages credibility faster than hypocrisy. The most respected leader I’ve known was our principal, who treated everyone with fairness and integrity, regardless of status.

Finally, accountability matters. Strong leaders make tough decisions and don’t shift blame when things go wrong. They also don’t grab excessive credit when things go well. That kind of responsibility builds trust and encourages others to take risks thoughtfully.

So yeah, for me, a good leader is someone who combines vision, humility, consistency, and accountability—and I’ve seen firsthand how those qualities make a huge difference.

Speaking Sample 19: How can communities support people who are struggling? What approaches work best based on what you've seen?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Well, from what I’ve seen, communities support struggling people best when they combine practical help with respect for dignity. It’s not just about handing out aid—it’s about involving people in their own solutions. Programs that treat recipients as active participants work way better than top-down charity that makes them feel passive or helpless.

For example, I’ve seen this at a local community center. They provide food assistance, sure, but they also create opportunities for people to contribute. Some recipients help organize distributions, tutor children, or maintain facilities. And honestly, that approach recognizes that economic hardship doesn’t erase someone’s abilities or their desire to be useful.

Another thing that works is tackling root causes, not just symptoms. Temporary aid helps in the short term, but if you don’t also build skills, expand access to education, or address mentalhealth challenges, people can end up stuck in dependency.

Communities also need to reduce stigma. If asking for help feels shameful, people suffer silently. Normalizing mutual aid makes support more sustainable and less isolating.

And finally, listening matters. When communities ask people what they need, they avoid wasting resources on misguided efforts. That kind of responsiveness builds trust and makes support far more effective.

Speaking Sample 20: Describe a social problem that concerns you. Why does this matter, and what can be done to address it?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

One social problem that really concerns me is social media addiction, especially among young people. Honestly, it feels like we’re running this giant, uncontrolled experiment on developing brains. And early evidence already shows increases in anxiety, depression, attention difficulties, and weaker inperson social skills.

It’s not just about individual health, though. I think it also threatens social cohesion. When people spend most of their time in curated online spaces surrounded by like-minded voices, they lose the ability to understand different perspectives. That fuels polarization and makes collective problem-solving much harder.

So, what can be done? First, parents and educators need resources to teach healthy tech habits. Outright bans don’t usually work, but guiding young people to use social media responsibly can make a difference. Schools could also integrate digital literacy, showing students how platforms are designed to exploit psychological vulnerabilities.

On a bigger scale, regulation is necessary. Tech companies face almost no accountability for products engineered to maximize engagement at the expense of well-being. Just as we regulate other publichealth risks, we need guardrails for technologies that shape billions of lives.

For me, the urgency comes from the fact that children can’t reasonably consent to this kind of influence. Protecting them—and society as a whole—means acting sooner rather than later.

Speaking Sample 21: Should young people be required to do community service? What are the benefits or drawbacks you see?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I think requiring young people to do community service is a bit of a tradeoff. On the one hand, I generally support it because the benefits are clear. On the other hand, if it’s done poorly, it can backfire.

The advantages are pretty strong. Service exposes young people to social issues they might otherwise ignore. It builds empathy, gives them a sense of agency, and shows them they can make tangible contributions. Plus, it helps organizations with limited resources while giving students practical skills.

But problems come up when service feels like punishment or just a hollow requirement. I’ve seen students complete hours of busy work that benefits no one, and that teaches them volunteering is boring rather than meaningful.

So, the key is thoughtful implementation. Effective programs should offer choice in placements so students can match their interests. They should also include structured reflection, helping students connect their experiences to bigger social issues. And of course, they should partner with organizations that genuinely need help, not invent tasks just to tick a box.

With those elements, required service can cultivate lasting civic engagement. Without them, it risks wasting time and even discouraging future volunteering. So yeah, I’d say it can be a great idea—but only if it’s designed carefully.

Category 4: Technology & Modern Life (22-28)

Speaking Sample 22: How has technology changed the way you communicate with others? Is this change positive or negative? Why?

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

Well, technology has completely reshaped the way I communicate. I’m now constantly connected through messaging apps, social media, and video calls, which means I can maintain relationships across distances that would’ve been impossible before. For example, I regularly talk with friends who moved abroad, and without these tools, those friendships probably would have faded.

Of course, there are drawbacks. Conversations often happen in short, fragmented bursts instead of deep, focused exchanges. I sometimes multitask while messaging, which makes me only half attentive. Even face-to-face interactions can be disrupted by notifications, reducing the authenticity of communication.

So, whether this change is positive or negative really depends on how intentionally we use technology. The tools themselves are neutral—they can enrich a connection or undermine it. Personally, I set boundaries, like avoiding my phone during meals and scheduling time for meaningful conversations. That way, I get the benefits without losing depth.

Speaking Sample 23: Should parents limit their children's screen time? What's your view, and what experiences inform your opinion?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I think parents should definitely set reasonable limits on children’s screen time, but those boundaries should be flexible and age-appropriate rather than rigid rules. Too much unregulated screen use can affect attention, social development, and emotional regulation.

My opinion comes partly from observing younger relatives. One family encouraged outdoor play and reading while enforcing structured screen limits, while another allowed almost unlimited device use. The differences were clear—the children with balanced limits showed stronger focus, healthier social behavior, and more imaginative play, while the others seemed distracted and overly dependent on digital stimulation.

That said, banning screens completely isn’t realistic in today’s digital world. Children need to learn responsible habits, not avoidance. Effective guidelines might include no devices during meals, keeping bedrooms screen-free at night, and requiring daily outdoor activity. These measures promote healthier digital habits while still allowing constructive, educational screen use.

Speaking Sample 24: Describe how you use technology in your daily routine. Which tools are most helpful, and why?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Technology is honestly part of almost every aspect of my daily routine. My digital calendar is the most indispensable tool—it syncs across devices and keeps track of deadlines and commitments. Before I used it consistently, I often forgot tasks, but now reminders make me much more reliable.

For learning, I rely on online platforms. If I struggle with a concept, I can search for videos, articles, or interactive exercises until I find an explanation that works for me. That kind of personalized learning is something traditional classrooms can’t always provide.

Communication tools are also crucial. Messaging apps help me maintain casual contact, while scheduled video calls allow deeper conversations with friends and family who live far away. But I’ve realized that technology requires discipline. Social media, for instance, can be distracting, so I limit my access to certain times of day.

Overall, technology helps me stay organized, keep learning, and maintain relationships—but only when I use it intentionally.

Speaking Sample 25: Compare shopping online versus shopping in physical stores. Which do you prefer, and what makes it better for you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I generally prefer online shopping because of its convenience and variety. With just a few clicks, I can compare products, read reviews, and make purchases without spending hours traveling between stores. The selection online is also much broader, especially for specialized items, so it’s easier to find exactly what I need.

Price comparison is another big advantage. In physical stores, you’d have to visit multiple locations, which most people don’t do. Online, you can quickly check prices across platforms and ensure you’re getting fair value.

That said, physical stores still matter. For clothing or high-investment items, I prefer seeing them in person. Fit, fabric quality, and build integrity are hard to judge from photos, and in-store inspection prevents the hassle of returns.

So, honestly, the best strategy is a hybrid one. I usually research online to narrow down choices, then check key options in person before buying through whichever channel offers the best combination of price and quality.

Speaking Sample 26: How do social media platforms affect relationships? Share your observations or personal experiences.

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

Social media affects relationships in both positive and negative ways. On the positive side, it helps me maintain friendships with people I rarely see. By staying updated on their lives through posts and occasional chats, I’ve kept connections that probably would’ve faded otherwise.

But there are downsides. Social media encourages people to present curated versions of themselves—highlight reels rather than authentic experiences. That can distort perceptions and lead to unhealthy comparisons. I’ve caught myself feeling inadequate after scrolling through others’ posts, even though I know they’re leaving out challenges and ordinary moments.

Another issue is superficial engagement. Liking posts or leaving quick comments can create the illusion of connection, even when meaningful conversations haven’t happened in months.

So, I’d say the impact depends on how intentionally you use it. If social media supplements deeper communication, it strengthens relationships. But if it becomes the main form of interaction, the emotional depth can erode.

Speaking Sample 27: Should companies collect personal data to improve their services? Where should the line be drawn? Why?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I think companies should be allowed to collect limited personal data when it directly improves user experience, but many current practices go far beyond reasonable boundaries. The main issue is the power imbalance—companies know exactly what they’re collecting and how they’re using it, while users often give “consent” through long, confusing privacy policies.

Some data collection makes sense. For example, navigation apps need location access, and streaming services rely on preference data to recommend shows. Those uses are functional and transparent, and they clearly benefit users.

But extensive behavioral profiling, cross-platform tracking, and selling data to third parties feel like a serious breach of autonomy. Most people would object if they fully understood the scale of surveillance happening behind the scenes.

So, the line should be drawn at explicit, informed consent. Companies should explain clearly what data they collect, why they need it, and who will access it—using plain language, not legal jargon. Users should also have control, including the ability to view, export, and delete their data.

Speaking Sample 28: What technology do you think will change daily life in the next ten years? How will this affect people?

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

I’d say artificial intelligence will be the most transformative technology in the next decade. We already see early versions helping with routine tasks, but future systems will be far more advanced and seamlessly integrated into daily life.

At work, AI will automate not just manual tasks but also complex cognitive ones—like analyzing data, drafting reports, or even making strategic recommendations. Sure, some jobs may disappear, but new roles will emerge. Workers who adapt early and develop skills that complement AI will definitely have an advantage.

Education will also change. AI can create personalized learning pathways, offering tailored explanations, adaptive practice, and individualized pacing. That could reduce inequalities, provided access is fair and widespread.

Of course, there are concerns. AI raises questions about privacy, manipulation, and over-dependence. If systems start influencing what we read, buy, or even believe, safeguarding human autonomy becomes essential.

So, the impact really depends on responsible implementation and regulation. If managed well, AI could make life more efficient and equitable. If not, it could create serious risks.

Category 5: Culture & Experience (29-34)

Speaking Sample 29: Which period of history would you like to visit if you could travel back in time? Tell me why based on your own thoughts or experiences.

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I would visit Renaissance Florence during the 15th century. This era fascinates me because it represents a remarkable convergence of art, science, and philosophical inquiry that transformed Western civilization. Witnessing artists like Leonardo da Vinci creating masterpieces while simultaneously advancing scientific understanding would be extraordinary.

What particularly captivates me is the prevailing spirit of intellectual curiosity—questioning established doctrines and exploring unprecedented ideas. I'm intrigued by whether ordinary citizens recognized they were experiencing such transformative changes, or if these shifts only became apparent retrospectively.

I'd also want to comprehend how patronage systems functioned, with affluent families funding artists and scholars. This relationship between wealth and cultural production seems paradoxical, both enabling remarkable achievements and potentially constraining creative autonomy.

From studying history, I've recognized that every era involves inherent trade-offs. Renaissance Florence certainly faced significant challenges—political instability, inequality, and disease. Yet experiencing how people navigated creating beauty and advancing knowledge amid adversity would provide an invaluable perspective on our contemporary moment.

Speaking Sample 30: What makes a place feel like home to you, besides just being where you live? Share examples from your own life.

High-Scoring Sample Answer: Home transcends physical location—it's about feeling genuinely comfortable without pretense. I've inhabited places that never felt like home despite prolonged residence, yet felt at home in places visited briefly.

For me, home requires several elements. First, familiarity—understanding a place's rhythms and nuances. This knowledge eliminates constant navigation, providing comfort. When I relocated for university, it didn't feel like home until I'd established routines and discovered welcoming spaces.

Second, meaningful relationships transform places into homes. Visiting my childhood house after my family's departure illustrated this—the physical space remained identical, but without the people who imbued it with significance, it felt hollow. Conversely, my friend's apartment felt like home because her presence created that profound sense of belonging.

Finally, home involves autonomy over your environment. Making choices about your space matters enormously. Even pleasant hotels never quite feel like home—you're perpetually a guest following someone else's rules rather than truly inhabiting the space.

Speaking Sample 31: Describe a tradition that's important in your family or culture. Why does it matter, and what does it mean to you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

My family maintains a tradition of gathering every Sunday for dinner, which has continued throughout my lifetime. This might seem mundane, but in our increasingly fragmented world, maintaining this consistent connection requires genuine commitment.

These dinners matter because they create guaranteed time together, independent of special occasions or crises. We share ordinary updates, discuss challenges, celebrate modest victories, and simply enjoy each other's company. The consistency proves essential—this connection happens weekly regardless of life's demands.

Personally, this tradition provided stability during difficult periods. As I struggled with anxiety during adolescence, these Sunday dinners represented a reliable sanctuary where I belonged unconditionally. Even when reluctant to discuss my problems, being surrounded by family reminded me I wasn't facing challenges in isolation.

As I've matured, I've come to appreciate how this tradition embodies deeper values about prioritizing relationships over convenience. Maintaining consistent connection requires intentional effort, teaching that relationships need regular cultivation, not merely emergency intervention when circumstances deteriorate.

Speaking Sample 32: Tell me about a book, movie, or piece of art that changed how you see the world. What impact did it have?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Reading Viktor Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning fundamentally transformed my perspective on suffering and purpose. Frankl survived Nazi concentration camps and observed that prisoners who maintained purpose had superior survival prospects than those who relinquished hope, regardless of physical condition.

This book impacted me while I was dwelling on relatively trivial disappointments—university rejection, relationship dissolution, and academic setbacks. Reading about people maintaining dignity in unimaginably horrific circumstances provided a stark perspective.

Beyond contextualizing my specific situation, the book revolutionized my fundamental understanding of meaning. Frankl argues we can't always control circumstances, but we can always control our response and the meaning we assign to experiences. This shifted me from viewing myself as a passive victim to recognizing my agency in interpreting and responding to whatever transpires.

I started asking myself what meaning I could extract from difficulties rather than indulging in self-pity. This doesn't eliminate problems, but fundamentally changes one's relationship to them. The book taught me that purpose isn't discovered but created through your choices and interpretations.

Speaking Sample 33: Should museums return cultural artifacts to their countries of origin? What's your reasoning?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

 Museums should generally repatriate cultural artifacts to their countries of origin, particularly items acquired through colonialism, theft, or coercion. The standard justification for retaining these objects—that major museums provide superior preservation and broader accessibility—essentially argues that colonial powers should continue benefiting from historical exploitation.

Many artifacts hold profound cultural and spiritual significance to their original communities, meaning their display in foreign museums represents ongoing harm, not merely historical injustice. The Parthenon Marbles, for instance, were removed under questionable circumstances and remain in the British Museum despite Greece's repeated repatriation requests. The argument that they're better preserved in London ignores Greece's sophisticated contemporary museums and implies Greeks cannot adequately care for their own heritage.

However, some nuances exist. Artifacts from extinct civilizations present complex questions about legitimate claims. Items genuinely purchased deserve different consideration. Despite these complexities, the default position should favor repatriation unless compelling reasons argue otherwise, correcting historical power imbalances rather than perpetuating them.

Speaking Sample 34: How do you think travel changes people? Use your own experiences or observations to explain.

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

Travel can profoundly transform people by disrupting assumptions and exposing them to alternative ways of living, though simply visiting new places doesn't automatically create transformation. What matters is how people engage with unfamiliar environments and whether they remain receptive to having their perspectives challenged.

When I traveled abroad initially, I was struck by how many practices I'd considered universal were culturally specific. Something as mundane as meal timing—in Spain, dinner at 10 PM felt remarkably late, but locals found eating at 6 PM equally peculiar. These subtle differences accumulated, revealing how much I'd unconsciously assumed my approach was natural or correct.

More significantly, travel exposed me to people living fulfilling lives with completely different priorities than mine. This challenged my tendency to view my path as obviously right. Witnessing multiple valid approaches to life questions made me more deliberate about my choices rather than following default expectations.

While travel offers opportunities for growth, genuine transformation requires vulnerability and willingness for introspection.

Category 6: Environment & Daily Life (35-40)

Speaking Sample 35: What should individuals do to protect the environment? Which actions make the biggest difference? Why?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

Individuals should focus on both personal behavioral modifications and political engagement, because environmental protection requires multifaceted efforts. For personal actions, reducing consumption matters most—purchasing less, using items longer, and prioritizing quality over quantity. Our culture of perpetual consumption creates enormous waste and resource depletion. Being more deliberate about purchases would significantly diminish environmental impact.

Transportation choices also matter substantially. Utilizing public transit, cycling, or walking instead of driving alone reduces emissions considerably. While individual transportation choices may seem negligible, collectively they're significant.

However, individual actions alone cannot resolve environmental problems largely caused by industrial practices and policy failures. Political engagement might be the most crucial individual action—voting for candidates supporting environmental protection, contacting representatives about climate legislation, and supporting organizations advocating systemic change.

Companies and governments respond to pressure and incentives. Individual consumption changes send market signals, but political action transforms the regulations governing everyone's behavior. We need both approaches working synergistically, but focusing exclusively on personal behavior while ignoring systemic issues allows the biggest polluters to evade accountability.

Speaking Sample 36: Describe the habits that contribute to a healthy lifestyle. What habits work for you, and why do you maintain them?

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

Several interconnected habits contribute to my healthy lifestyle, though maintaining them requires consistent effort and conscious prioritization. Regular exercise is foundational—I work out most days, combining cardiovascular activity with strength training. This habit succeeds because I schedule it like any important appointment rather than exercising only when convenient.

Sleep is equally crucial but often underestimated. I maintain a consistent sleep schedule even on weekends, which initially felt restrictive but dramatically improved my energy and mood. Most people underestimate how adequate sleep affects everything—concentration, emotional regulation, physical health, and appetite control.

For nutrition, I prioritize cooking meals rather than relying on processed foods. Simple meals with whole ingredients provide superior nutrition and cost less than convenient alternatives. I avoid keeping junk food at home because relying on willpower alone proves unreliable.

What makes these habits sustainable is incorporating them into a routine rather than requiring constant decision-making. I exercise at consistent times and plan weekly meals in advance. This systematization eliminates the friction that undermines good intentions, making healthy choices automatic rather than perpetual battles.

Speaking Sample 37: Would you rather live in a city or a rural area? What factors matter most in your decision?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

I prefer urban living, though I recognize this choice involves significant trade-offs. Cities offer unmatched access to opportunities—diverse employment options, educational institutions, cultural amenities, and social connections. Living in a city means I can attend lectures, visit museums, experience numerous cuisines, and meet people from various backgrounds. This variety and intellectual stimulation matter enormously to me.

Cities also provide practical advantages. Public transportation reduces car dependency, benefiting both my budget and the environment. Walking to daily necessities rather than driving everywhere improves health while conserving time. The efficiency of urban living appeals to me—services and activities are concentrated rather than requiring lengthy journeys.

However, cities present challenges. Housing costs are substantially higher, meaning less space and financial stress. Noise and constant activity can be overwhelming. Natural environments require deliberate effort to access.

Rural areas offer benefits—lower costs, more space, tranquility, and proximity to nature. But professionally, I need access to opportunities concentrated in cities. For now, the professional prospects and cultural diversity of cities align better with my priorities.

Speaking Sample 38: How do you decide what to buy? What influences your choices about spending money?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

My purchasing decisions involve balancing several factors—necessity, quality, environmental impact, and long-term value rather than merely initial price. I start by questioning whether I genuinely need something or just want it impulsively. Waiting at least 24 hours before purchasing non-essential items eliminates many impulse acquisitions that would bring brief satisfaction followed by regret.

For necessary purchases, I research thoroughly, reading reviews and comparing options. I've learned that the cheapest options often cost more long-term when they deteriorate quickly and need replacement. Paying more initially for quality items that last years provides superior value than repeatedly buying cheap replacements.

Environmental impact increasingly influences my choices. I consider product durability, company practices, and whether items can be repaired rather than discarded. This sometimes means paying more, which I view as investing in sustainability.

Social influence affects purchases more than I'd like to acknowledge. Seeing what friends purchase or what's trending creates subtle pressure. I've become more conscious of this influence and deliberately question whether I want things for myself or because others possess them.

Speaking Sample 39: Describe your ideal daily routine. What would it include, and why would it work well for you?

High-Scoring Sample Answer:

My ideal daily routine would balance productive work, physical activity, social connection, and personal reflection without feeling rushed or overwhelmed. I'd wake naturally around 7 AM without an alarm, which requires consistent sleep schedules but dramatically improves morning mood and energy compared to jarring alarm interruptions.

Mornings would begin with exercise—either running or strength training—before daily obligations commenced. Morning workouts work optimally because energy and motivation are highest then, and completing exercise early means other commitments cannot interfere. Afterwards, a healthy breakfast while reading something unrelated to work provides transition time.

I'd dedicate mornings to demanding cognitive work requiring sustained concentration, as mental energy peaks then. This means scheduling creative projects or complex analysis for morning hours rather than filling them with meetings.

Midday should include lunch away from my desk, ideally with colleagues, providing both physical respite and social connection. Afternoons would handle less demanding tasks—emails and routine work.

Evenings would be protected from work, dedicated to hobbies or relaxation. Before bed, I'd reflect on the day, which facilitates sleep.

Speaking Sample 40: Should people work from home or go to an office? What are the advantages of each based on your perspective?

High-Scoring Sample Answer: 

Both remote work and office work offer distinct advantages, and the ideal arrangement probably varies by individual personality, job requirements, and life circumstances rather than one option being universally superior.

Remote work provides flexibility and eliminates commuting, which conserves time, money, and stress while reducing environmental impact. I can structure my day around my natural energy patterns rather than arbitrary office hours. Working in comfortable clothing from my own space increases comfort and productivity.

Remote work also enables superior work-life integration. I can complete household tasks during breaks or take brief walks to reset mentally. These small efficiencies make daily life more manageable.

However, offices provide structure and social connection that home environments often lack. Spontaneous conversations with colleagues can spark innovative ideas or solve problems quickly in ways scheduled video calls don't replicate. Physical separation between work and home helps some people mentally transition between professional and personal modes.

For me, hybrid arrangements work best—working remotely for focused individual work while attending offices for collaborative projects, capturing advantages of both approaches.

Recommended Practice Resources

To strengthen your preparation even further, explore these resources:

Duolingo Writing Sample: 40 Samples with High-Scoring Answers – Learn how high scorers structure written responses with clear organization and strong examples across diverse topics.

Complete DET Preparation Roadmap – Access a comprehensive preparation plan covering all question types, scoring insights, and expert study strategies.

For realistic mock tests, AI-powered feedback, and additional practice materials, visit DETPractice to simulate actual test conditions and track your improvement over time.

Summary

Success on the Duolingo English Test Speaking Sample comes from combining several elements: genuine English proficiency, clear organization, specific supporting examples, and confident delivery. These 40 sample responses demonstrate what high-scoring answers sound like—not perfect or flawless, but clear, well-organized, and substantive.

Remember that these samples serve as models for structure and development, not scripts to memorize. The most effective preparation involves understanding the patterns of strong responses, then practicing extensively with diverse prompts until you can spontaneously organize and deliver thoughtful answers within the time constraints.